ON SOME OF THE BLANK POINTS IN THE APPLICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL IN BULGARIA
Venelin Terziev1*, Nikolay Nichev2, Evgeniy Stoyanov3, Marin Georgiev4
1Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Natural History, Moscow, Russia Professor, Ph.D., D.Sc. (National Security), D.Sc. (Ec.), University of Rousse, Rousse, Bulgaria; National Military University, Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria; University of Telecommunications and Post, Sofia, Bulgaria, firstname.lastname@example.org
2Colonel Associate Professor, Ph.D., National Military University, Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria, email@example.com
3 Professor, Ph.D., D.Sc. (Ec.), Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria, firstname.lastname@example.org
4National Military University, Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria, email@example.com
This article discusses processes in the state related to regulation, organization and control, which essentially form the subject of administrative control. The purpose of the exposition is to define the sources which cause deviations and create problems for the subjects authorized by the state to exert control, based on an analysis of the interaction of the factors: authority, competence and success. As the executive, the local self-government, the prosecutor's office and the justice system stand out among them, the tasks related to the pledged have a specific character. Each source which is identified and reviewed acquires features of the state, interpreted as sovereign and simultaneously subject to a specific area, in properly initiated state control systems. The idea of the exposition is to present the author's point of view, revealing certain characteristics of the subjects in question, so that the system of general and administrative control in particular can seek solutions for the elimination of the identified weaknesses in the functioning of the particular systems and more generally in its work by extending the scope of powers delegated or exercised by it.
|FULL TEXT PDF